George Roy Hill's Film, The Sting
- Length: 575 words (1.6 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
George Roy Hill's Film (Movie), The Sting
The Sting is a classic story of revenge for the death of a good friend. Instead of the revenge being an eye for an eye, Hill has the leading characters get their revenge by coning the ,man responsible for the death, out of his money. Within the first ten minutes you are grabbed into the film. Hill breaks the conformity of other films by making the leading characters con-men. This is very different from other films because these men should not be looked at as the good guys but just the opposite.
George Roy Hill's film, The Sting uses many forms of irony in the setting of the 1920's Chicago to show the theme of revenge for a friends death. Johnny Hooker played by Robert Redford is the main character in the film. The irony in the film is that he is the 'good guy' and is also a gambling addict and street con-man. Hill also uses other forms of irony, Henry Gandorf played buy Paul Newman owns a gamblingwhore house which has a giant carousal in the middle. The film starts out quickly and keeps up the pace as it goes on. The film is set up like a book its opening credits are shown over each page. The film is also split up into chapters each with its own title. When the title of the chapter shows up it looks like a piece of paper and is turned going into the next scene.
The movie is very clever, the plan for the sting is very tricky and surprising to the viewer. Hill shows us most of the plan but leaves out small parts for an ending surprise. Johnny and Henry are very witty and smart, they make us like them from the very beginning and they keep it up until the end. The two con-men meet on behalf of the death of a mutual friend. Before Johnny's friend died he told him of a great man who could teach him to work the big con. The great man is referring to Henry and the big con is something larger that pickpocketing and small tricks. Listening to the music gives you the idea of exactly the type of film it is. The Entertainer is played many times throughout the film and is the perfect song. The song fits the pace of the movie and it shows that it is both fun and serious.
How to Cite this Page
| Essay on Wise and de Bont’s Journey to Hill House - Shirley Jackson’s 1959 novel The Haunting of Hill House introduces the frightening idea of supernatural manifestations to an audience who had never experienced a novel quite like this one. The novel presents ideas that were left to the audiences’ interpretation without blatantly explaining that Hill House is the home to many paranormal entities that haunt Eleanor Vance. Wise’s production uses psychological thrill tactics in conjunction with Nelson Gidding’s screenplay being an exact transcription of the novel, leaving the interpretation of the film up to the audience.... [tags: Shirley Jackson, The Haunting of Hill House]|
:: 6 Works Cited
| George Roy Hill's Movie Adaptation of Kurt Vonnegut's "Slaughter-House Five" - George Roy Hill's movie adaptation of Kurt Vonnegut's novel Slaughter-house Five is a fairly accurate version that stays relatively close to Vonnegut's own vision. Throughout Vonnegut novel Billy Pilgrim, a WWII soldier who was captured by the Germans and held captive as an American POW (prisoner of war), demonstrates several extreme compulsive tendencies due to the horrific events he witnessed as an American POW victim. After reading of Billy’s experiences, I did not have faith in the movies ability to accurately present Vonnegut's own personal feelings.... [tags: Cinema]|
:: 2 Works Cited
| Edwin S. Porter, D. W. Griffith, and George Melies Film Techniques Essay - Edwin S.Porter Edwin S. Porter contributed the following editing styles and techniques to film. He used a dissolve between every shot just and he frequently had the same action repeated across the dissolves. According to Filmrefrence.com “Edison Company’s new Vitascope projector in Indiana and California, and Porter worked with them as a projectionist in Los Angeles and Indianapolis. Later that year he went to work for Raff & Gammon in New York but left after the Edison Company broke with Raff & Gammon.... [tags: film, movies, camera setup]|
:: 3 Works Cited
| Essay on Comparing Orwell's Novel 1984 And Gilliam's Film Brazil - There are awfully similar moments between George Orwell's novel 1984, and Terry Gilliam's film Brazil. The perspectives of governments in both plots are surprisingly similar because both stories have fascist governments. Both governments are similar in their ways of controlling their citizens, solving their problems and both can connect to a real life growing concern of government control in Europe. Orwell's government is one of which is purely fascist but their only goal is thought control. To the Ingsoc party, nothing but the control of thought matters.... [tags: George Orwell, Terry Gilliam, Film Analysis]|
:: 3 Works Cited
| Poetic Analysis of Fern Hill Essay - Poetic Analysis "Fern Hill" Dylan Thomas's poem "Fern Hill" represents the passage of one mans life from boyhood to adulthood and the realization of his mortality. The speaker in this poem uses expressive language and imagery to depict a tale of growing up. The use of colour adds life and character to people and abstract ideas. He looks up to "Time" (313) as an authority figure who has strict control of his life, and with descriptions of biblical figures we can presume that he is a religious person who believes that God is in control of his destiny.... [tags: Poetry Essays Poem Fern Hill ]|
:: 2 Works Cited
| McCarthyism in Film Essay - Two films, The Day the Earth Stood Still and Good Night and Good Luck, are produced over five decades apart and illustrated similar anti-communist sentiment. The first film, The Day the Earth Stood Still, was produced in 1951 during the height of the anti-communist movement or in other words McCarthyism. Good Night and Good Luck, which George Clooney directed and starred in, was produced in 2005 as a black and white docudrama film. These two films portray the mood felt by society during the 1950s through two complementary perspectives.... [tags: Film Analysis ]|
:: 5 Works Cited
|sting of prejudice Essay - Sting of Prejudice In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee there are many characters whose lives and thoughts about one another are distorted by prejudice and stereotyping. Three of the many characters whose lives were affected by prejudice are Bob Ewell, Tom Robinson and Dolfus Raymond. Bob Ewell’s mind is distorted in his view of other races. Tom Robinson is a victim of prejudice and is treated unfairly because of the color of his skin. The third character Dolfus Raymond is not accepted by the community because he is married to a black woman.... [tags: essays research papers]||637 words|
|Essay on George Bluestone’s Novels into Film - George Bluestone’s Novels into Film The first chapter of George Bluestone’s book Novels into Film starts to point out the basic differences that exist between the written word and the visual picture. It is in the chapter "Limits of the Novel and Limits of the Film," that Bluestone attempts to theorize on the things that shape the movie/film from a work of literature. Film and literature appear to share so much, but in the process of changing a work into film, he states important changes are unavoidable.... [tags: Bluestone Novels Films Essays]||693 words|
|George Lucas' film Star Wars Essay - George Lucas' film Star Wars There are many different theories to Star Wars, which attracted millions of viewers. These theories made Star Wars what it was, and to some people still is. Made in1977, it was the first of it's kind by being new, using aliens and special effects, Star Wars created a large audience. Then it was re-released twenty years later, after improvement in special effects and another character was added. I will be considering that Star Wars appeals to many different people, proof of this is that it was released again in 1997 and still was groundbreaking to the millions of older viewers, also capturing the imagination of the younger generation.... [tags: Papers]||1113 words|
|George Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion Essay examples - George Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion G.B Shaw believed that people should not be limited by their birth, environment or speech. With reference to Act 1 & Act five of Pygmalion, show how Eliza finds her status affected by all of these factors. At the time George Bernard Shaw wrote Pygmalion in 1912, many people were troubled with accents that prevented them from reaching high & in act 1, Eliza's character is an example of this. In act 1, we see how Eliza was very limited by her environment, her job, & her speech by the way that she was treated differently for who she was.... [tags: George Shaw Pygmalion Essays]||1904 words|
Hill Good Friend Men Should Good Guy Very Beginning Theme Of Revenge Great Man Many Forms Main Character Pace
The only problem that I had with the film is that there are some unneeded parts. There is a scene where Johnny meets a diner waitress and ends up going to bed with her. The next day we find that she is gone and the apartment is empty. When he next sees her she is shot and he is told that she was going to kill him. This whole section did not further the plot in any way and seemed to be meaningless to the film.
In the film The Sting director George Roy Hill shows that the theme is the revenge for a friends death. Hill uses a more respectable way to gain revenge than just killing the man who is responsible. The main characters in the film con the gangster responsible for their friends death out of his money and his dignity. Using the main characters as the 'good guys' Hill makes them con men to go against the regular Hollywood style.
The Sting is a movie about a big revenge con during 1930s. The style of the movie pulls you right into the time period, and most importantly it pulls you into one of the best things about that time period that you see in films: fast-talking and fedora-wearing con men, gangsters, and cops. It’s one of my favorite types of movie, and The Sting is a prime example.
Luther Coleman (Robert Earl Jones), Johnny Hooker (Robert Redford), and Joe Erie are small-time con men in 1930s Chicago. As the film opens, they take this guy working for mobster Doyle Lonnegan (Robert Shaw) for all he’s got. Too bad it wasn’t just his to loose. They are thrilled with their big score, that is until they find out it was actually Lonnegan’s money. Lonnegan is a “guy who would kill a grifter over a chunk of money that wouldn’t support him for two days,” and our boys took a lot more than that. Luther ends up bearing the brunt of Lonnegan’s wrath, and that’s puts Hooker in double position of a man out for revenge and a man with a target on his back.
Before Lonnegan’s guys caught up with him, Luther told Hooker to see a guy named Henry Gondorf (Paul Newman) who would teach him to play the big con (go after bigger marks and make more money). Gondorf agrees to help Hooker with his revenge con against Lonnegan, being a friend of Luther’s. They put together a gang and a very complicated con (even after seeing the movie like a bazillion times I’m not sure I could explain it very effectively). It involves so many double crosses and plot twists; I guarantee you will not see the end coming.
The plan involves several deceptions and manipulations, but I’m just going to focus on some of the individual scenes and players without bringing them together. That’s for the film to do. One phase of the con involves Gondorf pretending to be drunk and then obviously cheating Lonnegan at poker. This part is really hilarious, and yet tension filled at the same time. We’re worried for Gondorf; Lonnegan is a very formidable opponent. We’re worried that he’s going to be discovered, but the brilliant thing about the plan is that we want him to be discovered in part at least. It’s important that Lonnegan knows he’s been cheated, because that’s going to rope him into the second part of the con.
The second part revolves around horse racing. Suffice it to say that they are going to trick Lonnegan into betting on the wrong horse and loosing a lot of money. They craft a betting club, hire a ton of actors to populate it, and devise a tricky signalling system to communicate between buildings. Lonnegan again figures out he’s been cheated, but not to depth that Hooker and Gondorf cheated him. They bring in the cops for this final deception and they pull it off perfectly. It’s really cool to see everyone drop character once Lonnegan leaves the room.
I’m not sure if the amazing cast trumps the twisty plot or the 1930s time period, but it might. We have Robert Redford and Paul Newman back together again, and they are as great together here as they were in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. Newman’s Gondorf is the more responsible one, keeping Redford’s reckless Hooker in check. The great part about this is that it gives yet another dimension to the story, which already has about a million layers. While Lonnegan has about three people chasing down Hooker, the cops are also after him, and Gondorf has someone keeping an eye on all of them. He understands Hooker really well, more than Hooker thinks he does.
Robert Shaw is always a great villain, and his performance as Lonnegan is no exception to that rule. Even though Lonnegan is getting played the whole time and doesn’t know what hit him, Shaw still makes him a force to contend with. Even though we have faith in Gondorf and Hooker, we also have faith in Lonnegan, we never underestimate his power to retaliate. That’s hard to pull off when you’re playing a guy who’s getting taken for everything he has. Another clueless bad guy is a young Charles Durning as Snyder, one of the cops who’s chasing Hooker. He has no clue of the larger machinations at play here, but he goes after Hooker and gets taken in just as Lonnegan does. And even though he seems slow (“If Snyder knows, everybody knows. He never gets anything first!”) that doesn’t stop him from banging people’s heads around when he does catch up with them.
Another star here is the soundtrack. It makes use of old ragtime tunes, such as Scott Joplin’s ever popular “The Entertainer.” According to reliable sources who were alive at the time (aka my parents) this movie totally brought that song back. It fits the film’s style perfectly, even though ragtime has been around longer than the 1930s. The style, as I already mentioned, is great. Everyone’s wearing suits and fedoras; I’m a big fan. The buildings are all really old-timey and grungy in the poorer parts of town. The dialogue fits the time period perfectly and is also one of the highlights of the film.
The Sting has so many great aspects. The multiple plot twists that you never see coming, the characters and the actors that play them perfectly, the soundtrack, and the classic 1930s style. The Sting hit a homer in 1973, winning seven academy awards for art direction, costume design, directing, editing, music, writing, and most importantly best picture. It was also nominated for three more: cinematography, sound, and Redford for lead actor. The Sting is definitely a worthy choice by the academy.
“How do you wanna work this, flat rate or percentage?”
“Who’s the mark?”
Long story short: 3.5/4 stars